If you spend any time in video production and marketing, you already know that the words “RAW footage” trigger two very different reactions: excitement over the creative freedom and dread over the workflow burden. In recent years, two formats, Apple’s ProRes RAW and Adobe’s CinemaDNG, have become the loudest voices in the RAW conversation.
Both promise pristine image quality and generous latitude in post, yet they approach those goals in ways that rarely overlap. The end result is a reality most producers eventually face: you have to pick a side. Understanding why that choice matters, and how it ripples across your gear, your storage, your color pipeline, and even your client relations, will save headaches and hard costs down the road.
Understanding RAW in Modern Filmmaking
What Makes a Format “RAW”?
RAW means the sensor data travels from the camera to your storage with minimal in-camera interpretation. Instead of baking in white balance, sharpening, or heavy compression, the camera tags that data as metadata. In post, you, and not the camera, decide how the scene ultimately looks. From a creative standpoint, RAW is as close as you can get to hauling the set back into the suite and re-lighting the scene from scratch.
Why Colorists Love RAW
Latitude is the headline benefit. Because highlight and shadow information remain largely intact, colorists can recover blown windows, tame noisy shadows, and reshape contrast without the banding or macro-blocking that plagues 8-bit codecs. That freedom translates to punchier commercials, more dramatic social teasers, and longer shelf life for evergreen marketing assets that may need a fresh grade next season.
ProRes RAW at a Glance
Where It Shines
Developed by Apple, ProRes RAW combines the familiar ProRes editing experience with the advantages of RAW. The key perk is efficiency. File sizes are far smaller than CinemaDNG, and playback inside Final Cut Pro, Premiere (with a plug-in), and Resolve is surprisingly smooth on modern laptops.
Many DITs love that ProRes RAW files inherit timecode and naming conventions similar to ProRes 422 HQ, simplifying conformity. Productions with tight turnarounds, think daily social cuts for a campaign roll-out, often favor ProRes RAW for just that reason.
When It Stumbles
The format is still wrapped in Apple’s ecosystem. While support has expanded, it’s not yet universal. If your post house lives in Avid or your VFX pipeline leans on Linux-based tools, ProRes RAW becomes a square peg in a round hole. There’s also the perpetual debate about “partial de-mosaic.” Apple handles some sensor interpolation before you ever hit the timeline, which purists argue nudges the format closer to a compressed log file than true RAW.
For most commercial projects, that’s splitting hairs, but high-end cinematographers shooting for HDR exhibition may bristle.
CinemaDNG Unpacked
The Good
CinemaDNG is as open-standard as RAW gets. Each frame is stored as an individual DNG file, essentially a digital negative. Because the spec is published, nearly every major grading, compositing, and VFX tool can read it natively. Color scientists adore the untouched sensor data; there’s no intermediary algorithm deciding what information to keep.
For agencies archiving footage that could reappear across multiple campaigns or platforms, that transparency is gold.
The Trade-Offs
With that purity comes pain: file sizes balloon. A single minute of 4K CinemaDNG 30 fps can chew through tens of gigabytes, making on-set downloads and backups slower and pricier. Playback often requires transcoding to a proxy codec, adding an extra step before the editorial team can even generate rough cuts.
Finally, because each frame is its own file, media management grows cumbersome. Misplace a few frames and your timeline stutters, something mid-tier marketing teams with lean post crews can’t always babysit.
You Can’t Have Both, Choosing Based on Real-World Factors
In a perfect world, a single format would deliver CinemaDNG’s transparency with ProRes RAW’s speed. Reality says otherwise. The choice usually hinges on the following production variables:
- Camera Ecosystem: A Sony FX6 with an Atomos Ninja supports ProRes RAW out of the box, while a Blackmagic Pocket 6K records natively to CinemaDNG. Switching formats often means swapping hardware.
- Storage Budget: If you’re shipping SSDs back and forth every few days, CinemaDNG’s file footprint multiplies shipping and media costs, real dollars your client may notice.
- Post-Production Timeline: Social deliverables due 48 hours after wrap favor the near-drop-in usability of ProRes RAW. Long-form branded docs with months in post can accommodate CinemaDNG’s heavier lift.
- Team Experience: Editors comfortable with log workflows slide into ProRes RAW without much friction. VFX artists who regularly ingest OpenEXR sequences usually feel right at home with CinemaDNG’s frame-based paradigm.
- Deliverable Specs: HDR10 for streaming platforms benefits from every extra stop CinemaDNG can dig out. A 1080p Instagram reel will never reveal that difference.
Future-Proofing Your Library
Marketing campaigns rarely live in isolation. That hero product video may feed repurposed cut-downs, AR activations, or interactive kiosks over the next five years. If you know your client’s brand strategy leans on evergreen content, the extra overhead of CinemaDNG might pay dividends.
Conversely, if a launch video has a half-life of six weeks, rapid iteration beats hypothetical long-term flexibility every time. Studying the brand’s content calendar, and not just the current project, grounds your format decision in business reality, not tech trivia.
Final Thoughts
Both ProRes RAW and CinemaDNG unlock creative possibilities that older 8-bit, long-GOP codecs simply can’t match. Yet the practicalities of video production and marketing mean that chasing “the best” image quality can backfire if it derails budgets or deadlines. ProRes RAW offers a nimble bridge between acquisition and edit, catering to fast-moving teams that value speed.
CinemaDNG, though heavier, guards the integrity of every photon your camera captured, rewarding workflows that can nurture that data all the way to final grade. Decide which pain points you can live with, build your pipeline around that choice, and stick with it until the project is shipped. Because in the RAW game, trying to juggle both formats rarely ends well, for your RAID arrays, your editors, or your clients.
.jpeg)
